State v. Constanzo
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIVENS, Justice.
Prior to his trial for and conviction of receiving stolen property in violation of Section 18-4612, I.C., appellant, by timely motion, sought to suppress from evidence the stolen cigarettes as obtained by an il legal search and- the denial of such motion is the principal assignment of error.
The affidavit for the warrant described the premises to be searched as:
" * * * in a certain space under the building known and designated as the Roma Club, located in Garden City, Idaho, occupied by and under the control of said Ralph Constanzo, * * *.” The warrant commanded search—
“ * * *…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. McLennanIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- United States v. William Joseph MartellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Ocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- State v. YoderIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.