Legal Opinion

State v. Constanzo

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1954No. 8093PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Justice.

Prior to his trial for and conviction of receiving stolen property in violation of Section 18-4612, I.C., appellant, by timely motion, sought to suppress from evidence the stolen cigarettes as obtained by an il legal search and- the denial of such motion is the principal assignment of error.

The affidavit for the warrant described the premises to be searched as:

" * * * in a certain space under the building known and designated as the Roma Club, located in Garden City, Idaho, occupied by and under the control of said Ralph Constanzo, * * *.” The warrant commanded search—
“ * * *…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. McLennanIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. GarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BockIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. United States v. William Joseph MartellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Ocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. State v. YoderIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API