Grossman v. New York Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*991The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Israel Gross-man (hereinafter Grossman) on the ground that it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. “[U]nder the transactional approach adopted by New York in res judicata jurisprudence, ‘once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy’ ” (Marinelli Assoc. v…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Goldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Marinelli Associates v. Helmsley-Noyes Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Yenrab, Inc. v. 794 Linden Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Barns & Farms Realty, LLC v. NovelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Jovanovic v. JovanovicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. MarcheseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hoeg Corp. v. Peebles Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Pondview Corp. v. BlattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Selletti v. LiottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.