Marinelli Associates v. Helmsley-Noyes Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ellerin, J.
At issue on this appeal is whether claims, which would otherwise be timely, should be barred by principles of res judicata because they arise from the same series of transactions as claims that were raised in a previous action that was dismissed on Statute of Limitations grounds.
This action had its genesis in a joint venture known as 64 Fulton Street Development entered into by plaintiff Marinelli Associates, and Jack Vickers and Donald Weill, individually, for the purpose of owning and operating a parcel of commercial realty-located at 64 Fulton Street in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Smith v. Russell Sage CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Singleton Management, Inc. v. CompereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Yeiser v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Joseph v. AthanasopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Grossman v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Pitcock v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Sosa v. JP Morgan Chase BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.