People v. Gore
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
VOLLACK, Justice.
The state appeals the district court’s dismissal of the complaint filed against Terry Allen Gore (Gore or the defendant). The judge ruled that he did not have power, under either the probation statute or the restitution statute, to order an extension of Gore’s probation for an alleged probation violation. The narrow issue presented for our review is whether the trial court correctly ruled that it lacked the statutory power to revoke the defendant’s probation because the revocation proceeding had not been instituted until after Gore’s probation term had expired. We affirm.
I
In…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. LedfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- People v. FlennikenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- State v. MortrudWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. JenkinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. RichardsColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- People v. EffersonColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.