Legal Opinion

Shelby Contracting Co. v. Pizitz

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 12, 1970No. 8 Div. 279PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Complainant, a corporation, filed its bill of complaint seeking to establish and enforce a mechanic’s lien. The court sustained a demurrer to the bill as amended and complainant moved to dismiss the bill as provided by § 755, Title 7, Code 1940, as amended by Act No. 72, approved September 15, 1961; 1961 Acts, Vol. II, page 1947.

From the decree granting complainant’s motion to dismiss, complainant appeals. The error complained of is the decree of the court sustaining the demurrer to the bill.

The question for decision is whether the allegations of the bill show that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Cloverdale Homes v. Town of CloverdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. McDermott v. ClaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Costello v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Cronin v. TatgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. BEACHCROFT PROPERTIES v. City of AlabasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. City of Orange Beach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Kizer v. FinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Natures Way Marine, LLC v. Dunhill Entities, LPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. City of Orange Beach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API