Legal Opinion

Kizer v. Finch

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1995No. 1940607PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Although the City of Helena was named as a defendant originally, the City's motion to dismiss was granted; the appellant does not challenge that dismissal. Thus, the Court does not treat the City of Helena as a party to this appeal.

Does occupancy by a subdivision lot owner of an unimproved but publicly dedicated strip of property, lying between the front line of the lot and the street curb, vest in the lot owner a property right superior to the right of the public to use the right-of-way, as contemplated by the public dedication? Under the facts of this case, we answer the question in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cloverdale Homes v. Town of CloverdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Lybrand v. Town of Pell CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Blair v. FullmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Town of Citronelle v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  5. Shelby Contracting Co. v. PizitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Orange Beach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. City of Orange Beach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Kizer v. FinchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Kizer v. FinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Pritchett v. Mobile CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API