Kizer v. Finch
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
1 Although the City of Helena was named as a defendant originally, the City's motion to dismiss was granted; the appellant does not challenge that dismissal. Thus, the Court does not treat the City of Helena as a party to this appeal.
Does occupancy by a subdivision lot owner of an unimproved but publicly dedicated strip of property, lying between the front line of the lot and the street curb, vest in the lot owner a property right superior to the right of the public to use the right-of-way, as contemplated by the public dedication? Under the facts of this case, we answer the question in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cloverdale Homes v. Town of CloverdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Lybrand v. Town of Pell CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Blair v. FullmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Town of Citronelle v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Shelby Contracting Co. v. PizitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Orange Beach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- City of Orange Beach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Kizer v. FinchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Kizer v. FinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Pritchett v. Mobile CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006