Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Clinton

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 24, 2007No. AC 27012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

This is a legal malpractice action brought by the plaintiffs, Marc Weiner and TMG Marketing, Inc., against the defendant law firm of Brown, Paindiris & Scott, LLP, and one of its partners, the defendant Steven W. Varney. On appeal, the plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s dismissal of their claims as unripe for adjudication. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the following relevant facts and procedural history. On December 7, 2004, the plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that the defendants had failed to represent them adequately in earlier…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Sheff v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Mayer v. Biafore, Florek & O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. In Re MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Lake v. CravensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Rosenfield v. I. David Marder & Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Cadle Co. v. D'ADDARIOConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. Orlando v. LiburdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API