Legal Opinion
Wayne R. Anderson v. Willow L. Cramlet, the Arvada Sentinel, and Donald Goreham
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1986No. 85-1026PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The appeal is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
In this diversity action, Wayne Anderson, pro se, appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendants. Mr. Anderson contends that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether certain allegedly defamatory statements in a “letter to the editor”…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Rsbi Aerospace, Inc. v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Law Co., Inc. v. MOHAWK CONST. AND SUPPLY CO.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- We, Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Quaker State Minit-Lube, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
- Read v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.