Hammock v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
A jury convicted William R. Hammock of second-degree eriminal trespass 1 for remain-. ing on the premises of the Rookies Sports Bar & Grill in Sitka after he was repeatedly asked to leave. Hammock argues that a new trial is necessary because he was prejudiced by the trial court's refusal to excuse two jurors he challenged for cause. He also claims that the court should have granted his motion for judgment of acquittal because the criminal trespass statute does not prohibit his conduct: leaving the Rookies premises each time he was asked to leave, then returning…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Arabie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Sosa v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Triplett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
- Eaklor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- LINDOFF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010