Legal Opinion

LINDOFF v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 12, 2010No. A-10323Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Alaska Criminal Rule 11(c) contains a list of warnings and advisements that a judge must give to a criminal defendant, as well as questions that the judge must pose to the defendant, before the judge accepts the defendant's plea of guilty or no contest. This appeal requires us to examine and interpret the rules that apply when a defendant seeks to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest based on the assertion that the judge who accepted their plea failed to comply with one or more of the provisions of Criminal Rule l1(c).

The defendant, Newton Lindoff, was indicted for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  3. Uchitel Co. v. Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Audrey H. v. State, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Russell v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API