Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Rome
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 12, 1974No. 9910PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
303 So.2d 844 (1974)
E. R. TAYLOR et ux.
v.
Robert L. ROME et al.
No. 9910.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
November 12, 1974.
Rehearing Denied December 16, 1974.
Charles W. Franklin, Baton Rouge, for appellants.
David M. Ellison, Jr., Baton Rouge, for appellees.
Before LOTTINGER and COVINGTON, JJ., and BAILES, Judge Pro Tem.
BAILES, Judge Pro Tem.
The issue of this appeal by the plaintiffs is the sufficiency of the award of damages. Defendants have neither appealed nor answered the appeal. On our finding that the award was inadequate, we increase the quantum. As amended, the judgment is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gaspard v. LeMaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Lomenick v. SchoefflerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Miller v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. HarveyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bergeron v. ThomasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- DiVincenti v. DesforgesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hickman v. SumrallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Williams v. HarveyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976