Lomenick v. Schoeffler
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
We granted a writ of review in this whiplash type injury case in which the Court of Appeal reduced the judgment of the district court based on a jury verdict from $10,000.00 ter $5'500;00 because we considered that the opinion of the Court of Appeal revealed that the reduction was made on the basis of classification of the injury as “moderate” rather than on any substantial, specific reasons compelled by the particular facts and circumstances of this case. 1 The Court of Appeal did indicate by certain language that it understood the “rationale behind the appellate review of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaspard v. LeMaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Cassreino v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Winfree v. Consolidated UnderwritersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Robinson v. American Home Assurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by315 opinions
- Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Reck v. StevensSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Anderson v. Welding Testing Laboratory, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
310 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.