Legal Opinion
Snortland v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 23, 2000No. 20000025PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Howard Snortland appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his action against the State for breach of an employment contract. We conclude Snortland’s action is barred as a matter of law by the six-year statute of limitations, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] The underlying facts are undisputed. Snortland served as superintendent of the Department of Public Instruction (“Department”) from January 1, 1977, through December 31, 1980. As superintendent, Snortland was statutorily required to serve as a member of the Board of Trustees (“Board”) of the Teachers’ Fund for Retirement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Narum v. Faxx Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Lumber Village, Inc v. SieglerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Martin v. HowardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- McDowell v. GillieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Hoffner v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Muhammed v. WelchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Tarnavsky v. McKenzie County Grazing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.