Kaspersky Lab, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
The United States government's networks and computer systems are extremely *193important strategic national assets. Threats to these systems are constantly expanding and evolving. Their security depends on the government's ability to act swiftly against perceived threats and to take preventive action to minimize vulnerabilities. These defensive actions may very well have adverse consequences for some third-parties. But that does not make them unconstitutional.
Plaintiffs in the two lawsuits discussed in this Opinion represent Kaspersky Lab, a…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaspersky Lab, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland SEC. & Kirstjen M. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Dotson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Hastings College Conservation Com. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2020