Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Betts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1933No. 8 Div. 545PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Bill by Maud M. Betts against J. Elgie Hayes and William E. Davis to foreclose a mortgage, executed by O. C. Davis, deceased, to Milton H. Lanier and James H. Pride, and for a personal decree against the respondents for any balance that might remain due and owing to complainant — the transferee and owner of said mortgage — on the mortgage indebtedness, including costs and solicitor’s fees, after the proceeds derived from the sale of the land had been applied to the payment of said indebtedness.

It is made to appear from the averments of the amended bill that O. C. Davis, in his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Doe ex dem Duval's heirs v. McLoskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1840
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Blossom v. The Milwaukee, &C., Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hurt Building Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Barlowe v. Employers Ins. Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Spence v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Hackney v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API