In re Search Warrant Affecting No. 277 Fifth Ave.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
This motion is in all respects denied.
I. My authority to entertain this motion is to be found in Re 191 Front Street, Borough of Manhattan, City of New York (Kirvin v. United States), 5 F.(2d) 282 (C. C. A. 2); United States v. Casino, 286 F. 976, 980, 981 (D. C., S. D. N. Y.). Cf. also United States v. Madden (D. C.) 297 F. 679, 680.
IT. This search warrant proceeding was based on an alleged violation of section 18 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act, *298title 27, U. S. Code, § 30 (27 USCA § 30), which reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful to advertise,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- United States v. CasinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- United States v. BrunettDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1931
- Danovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.