Farnsworth v. City of Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Garland Farnsworth and John Johnson appeal pro se from the order of the district court1 sua sponte dismissing with prejudice their civil rights action for failure to comply with the district court’s orders to cooperate with appellees in preparing a discovery schedule. For reversal, appellants argue (1) the district court abused its discretion in dismissing their action with prejudice; (2) the district court erred in mooting appellants’ motion for a protective order and awarding attorneys’ fees to appel-lees for appellants’ failure to attend scheduled depositions; and (3) the district court’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burgs v. SisselCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Hazen v. PasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- G. Harold King, Jr., and Shirley G. King v. Fidelity National Bank of Baton Rouge, Capital Investment Inc. And Louisiana Equity Capital Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by33 opinions
- Aziz v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Dahl v. Kanawha Investment Holding Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
- Tyler v. Iowa State Trooper Badge No. 297District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Farnsworth v. City Of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Berd v. De BastosDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2019
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.