Legal Opinion

Simonel v. North Carolina School of the Arts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 1995No. COA95-71PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, MARK D., Judge.

Respondents appeal from judgment concluding the North Carolina School of Arts failed to follow its own regulations governing the review of petitioner’s non-reappointment. We affirm.

On 30 August 1988 petitioner Dolores Simonel entered into a five-year, fixed-term contract as a faculty member of respondent North Carolina School of the Arts (NCSA). Petitioner’s contract was expressly made subject to the NCSA Regulations on Academic Freedom and Faculty Appointments, Promotions, and Discharge (NCSA Regulations).

On 5 June 1992, following the required institutional review of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pamlico Marine Co. v. North Carolina Department of Natural Resources & Community Development, Coastal Resources Commission DivisionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Alexander v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. York Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of Environment, Health & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Frampton v. Univ. of N.C. At Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API