Legal Opinion

Alexander v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 16, 1994No. 934SC490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Because the hearing officer determined that petitioner’s vehicle was the only impediment to petitioner’s food stamp eligibility, the single issue presented by this appeal is whether, under the Exclusions from Resource Section of the Resource Eligibility Standards Provision of the Food Stamp Act, a vehicle can be excluded from an applicant’s eligibility determination as an “inaccessible resource” if the sale of the vehicle would not provide any significant return to the applicant. Petitioner contends that his vehicle can be excluded from his resource eligibility calculation as an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Gosman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Richard E. Lyng, Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Richard E. Lyng, Coalition for Basic Human Needs, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leslie A. Warren v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division of Social Services Michael Espy, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Simonel v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Beckman v. RomingerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API