Kim v. Chinn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This action is one for damages for assault and battery brought against O. S. Chinn, Jack Chinn, Johnson Chinn, Chin Wai and two fictitious defendants. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff upon a general verdict against the two defendants first named for the sum of $7,500, and against the first named defendant for an additional sum of $1,000 as exemplary or punitive damages. These two defendants appeal from the judgment.
*859The complaint contained eight counts. Counts 4, 5, 6 and 7 may be at once eliminated from consideration, since these charge the offense to have been committed either…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Evans v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Lewis v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Nightingale v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Embrey v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Huckeby v. SpanglerTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Roberts v. Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Embrey v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982