Legal Opinion

Smith v. Culpepper

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 20, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Complaint. Before, Judge Reese. Taliaferro superior court. February term, 1898.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

It was, upon the trial of an action upon a promissory note given for the purchase of a mule and on its face reserving in the seller the title to the property until paid for, erroneous to strike a plea alleging that the mule had died without any fault or negligence on the part of the defendant, and praying for a rescission of the contract of sale; there being no stipulation therein that the purchaser was to be liable in case the mule died. Civil Code, $ 3543. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring. Complaint. Before, Judge Reese. Taliaferro superior court. February term, 1898. Horace M.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKinney v. Battle Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API