Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Battle Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 25, 1913No. 4560PublishedCited by 4 opinions

. Complaint; from city court of Albany — Judge Crosland. July 8, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The action was against Thomas McKinney individually and as administrator of his wife, upon a promissory note given by them to Battle Brothers, the plaintiffs, for the purchase-price of a mare. In the note Battle Brothers reserved title to the mare until payment of the note, with a stipulation, however, that in case of loss or damage to the property the same should be the loss of the buyers; and this stipulation is coupled with the express condition that the sellers do not insure the health, life, soundness, or work of the said mare. Two pleas were filed, — one setting up fraud on the part of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. CulpepperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood v. Phoenix Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Avery & Co. v. MiddlebrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Pelham Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  4. Adams v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API