Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 2, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

The injury found by the master consisted of arousing into activity the germs of tuberculosis which were theretofore present in the workman’s system in an inactive state. Three causes contributing thereto, and each arising in the course of his employment, are found. Poisonous gases were present in the work-place under normal conditions, but these conditions were aggravated by poor ventilation and by the escape of more gases through leaky valves. A third cause was found in the exposure of the workman to extreme cold, when in a heated condition. The inhalation of the gases “irritated his throat…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guay v. Brown Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  2. Eaton v. ProctorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
  3. Lybolt v. W. H. Hinman, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rust Engineering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  2. Gagne v. New Haven Road Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. Bee v. Chicopee Mfg. Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  4. Kearns v. NuteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  5. Newell v. MoreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API