Legal Opinion

Walker v. Camp

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 22, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Blaolchawh Circuit Court. Action for malicious prosecution. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Ch. J.

This case is before us upon a second appeal. The first opinion is reported in 63 Iowa, 627.

1. MAMCIOVS ?or saieo°u: ohattefsfevimortgagee’s consent. 1. The plaintiff avers that the defendant maliciously, and without probable cause, procured him tobe indicted and prosecuted on a charge of grand larceny. The ° O " aLeged larceny consisted, as is charged, in selliag mortgaged personal property, to-wit: a lot of hogs, without the consent of the mortgagee, q|ie ¿[oes noj. ¿[eny that he sold a portion of the mortgaged property, but he claims that he sold it with the consent of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walker v. CampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Kletzing v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Hepker v. SchmickleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. McCaskey v. Ft. Dodge, Des Moines & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API