Legal Opinion

Hill v. Donnelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1941No. Civ. 11309PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment determining that a deed naming him as a joint grantee of certain real property is “void for failure of legal delivery thereof”, and that he holds the real property in trust for the benefit of the estate of Emma E. Donnelly, deceased, or for the residuary legatees named in her will. The two plaintiffs are executrices of the will of Emma E. Donnelly, and bring this action in their representative capacities. The defendant is executor of the will of deceased, and is sued both as executor and in his individual capacity. The questions presented to the trial court,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. MarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Clavey v. LoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Galvin v. O'LearyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Condencia v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Estate of GalvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Malley v. Sierra Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API