Legal Opinion

Cullen v. Foster

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1919No. Civ. No. 2415PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In this appeal, prosecuted by defendant on the judgment-roll, he upon highly technical grounds asks for a reversal of a judgment which, while against him as to Merinda Foster, was, as to the plaintiff Margaret Cullen, in his favor.

The complaint is in two counts, the first alleging that defendant is indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $1,475 for money had and received by him for their use and benefit, which sum, though demanded of defendant, he refused to pay to plaintiffs. In the second count, the subject of which is the same indebtedness, the transactions and evidentiary facts out of which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. PorshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Weinreich v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. SklarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Curtis v. Nye & NissenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Woods v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API