Coulter, J. v. Lindsay, A.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Serial Appellant, Jean Coulter, appeals pro se from the order entered on April 1, 2016. In this case, we hold that Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 233.1 is not void for vagueness under the federal and state constitutions and that our Supreme Court had the authority under the Pennsylvania Constitution to promulgate Rule 233,1. We also hold that Appellant’s repeated, frivolous appeals to this Court warrant the awarding of attorney’s fees and issuance of a filing injunction. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re William L.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by15 opinions
- Gray v. PennyMac Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Brown v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Labs., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Alexander, C. v. Delaware Cnty Bd of Elect.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- Bucano, B. v. The Law Offices of Gregory JavardianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- C.L. Scheib v. J. FriedmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.