Alpert v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
Standard of Review
The constitutional validity of a statute is a question of law this Court reviews de novo. Planned Parenthood , 220 S.W.3d at 737. This Court will presume the statute is valid and will not declare a statute unconstitutional unless it clearly contravenes some constitutional provision. Id. Alpert's petition challenged section 571.070 's validity under both the Missouri and United States constitutions.
*596Article I, Section 23 Challenge
Article I, section 23 of the Missouri Constitution provides:
That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms, ammunition, and accessories…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Grutter v. BollingerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Smith v. Taney Cnty.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Arthur Jefferson , II v. Missouri Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Christine Ann Lollar v. Richard Dwain LollarSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020
- City of St. Louis; St. Louis County; and Jackson County v. State of Missouri; and Eric Schmitt, Attorney General of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2022
- City of St. Louis; St. Louis County; and Jackson County v. State of Missouri; and Eric Schmitt, Attorney General of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.