Legal Opinion

Alpert v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 3, 2018No. SC 96024PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Standard of Review

The constitutional validity of a statute is a question of law this Court reviews de novo. Planned Parenthood , 220 S.W.3d at 737. This Court will presume the statute is valid and will not declare a statute unconstitutional unless it clearly contravenes some constitutional provision. Id. Alpert's petition challenged section 571.070 's validity under both the Missouri and United States constitutions.

*596Article I, Section 23 Challenge

Article I, section 23 of the Missouri Constitution provides:

That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms, ammunition, and accessories…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Grutter v. BollingerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. Taney Cnty.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Arthur Jefferson , II v. Missouri Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Christine Ann Lollar v. Richard Dwain LollarSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020
  4. City of St. Louis; St. Louis County; and Jackson County v. State of Missouri; and Eric Schmitt, Attorney General of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2022
  5. City of St. Louis; St. Louis County; and Jackson County v. State of Missouri; and Eric Schmitt, Attorney General of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API