Legal Opinion

Klingensmith v. Department of Labor & Industry

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Manderino,

Chester Klingensmith and Donald Armor, both registered licensed barbers, practiced barbering in tbe *206same shop which, was owned by Chester Klingensmith. Chester Klingensmith did not consider Donald Armor an employee and did not make any unemployment compensation contributions to the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Fund on account of Donald Armor. On June 3, 1969, the Bureau of Employment Security, Department of Labor and Industry, made a determination that Chester Klingensmith should have made contributions to the fund since Donald Armor was in his employment.

On…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marhoefer v. Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Abbanato v. Bureau of Employment SecurityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Inmates of Cumberland County Prison v. Commonwealth, Department of JusticeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Glatfelter Barber Shop v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Glatfelter Barber Shop v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API