Legal Opinion
Kincaid v. Garland
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 7, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2017-1941Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LISA M. KINCAID, Plaintiff, y Civil Action No. 17-1941 (RDM) MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Lisa Kincaid was employed as a special agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ (“ATF” or the “Bureau”) for over thirty years. As relevant here, she was assigned to work as an investigator in the Bureau’s Internal Affairs Division (“IAD”) between August 2012 and January 2016. In that role, it was Kincaid’s job to impartially investigate…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.