Texas Health Enterprises, Inc. v. Kirkgard
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURGESS, Justice.
Teresita Belen Kirkgard and Thelma Jean Rogers initiated this action, alleging Texas Health Enterprises (“T.H.E.”) wrongfully terminated their employment for refusing to sign a waiver of their rights under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. The case was removed to federal court, then remanded to state court. The federal district court’s order stated: “it is untrue that Plaintiffs’ allegations are necessarily federal in character in that they fall under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq.” Kirkgard and Rogers obtained an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Ellis County State Bank v. KeeverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Texas Steel Co. v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. BouchetTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Whole Foods Market Southwest, Inc. v. Tijerina, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Martinez v. IBP, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
- Lawrence v. CDB Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.