Legal Opinion

State v. Stanton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2022No. S067829PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

707 Argued and submitted June 22, 2021, resubmitted January 25; decision of Court of Appeals reversed, judgment of circuit court reversed, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings May 26, 2022 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. LAMAR LEE STANTON, Petitioner on Review. (CC 17CR17894) (CA A167725) (SC S067829)

511 P3d 1

Defendant asserted that the trial court violated his right to counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, by allowing him to proceed at trial without court-appointed counsel. Held: Defendant did not waive his right to court-appointed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dept. of Human Services v. E. L. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  3. State v. Hernandez-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. E. L. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API