Securities & Exchange Commission v. Saltzman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Defendant James B. Saltzman moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rules of Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b). Saltzman alternatively moves for a more definite statement. Having considered the defendant’s motion, the response of the plaintiff, Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the written and oral arguments of the parties in support of their positions, I conclude that the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or for a More Definite Statement should be denied.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pleads two…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Country Classics at Morgan Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Country Classics at Morgan Hill, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Synagro-WWT, Inc. v. Rush Tp., Penn.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Altimari v. Bucks County Railroad Preservation and Restoration Corp. d/b/a New Hope & Ivyland RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Burton v. WETZELDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.