Eubanks v. West & Baggett

This was a proceeding to foreclose a sawmill man’s lien. .The evidence was sharply conflicting, both as to what was the contract and as to whether the contract even as claimed by the plaintiffs had been substantially complied with. The evidence authorized a finding in favor of either party ; and hence the judgment refusing a new trial will not be reversed, unless some error *805of law was committed which was prejudicial to the losing party. The judge charged the jury that if they found in favor of the plaintiffs, they should return a general verdict .for so many dollars, with interest. This…