Legal Opinion

WINTJEN v. DENNY'S, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00069Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JULI WINTJEN, on behalf of herself and all ) others similarly situated, ) ) 2:19-CV-00069-CCW Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) DENNY'S, INC., DOE DEFENDANTS 1- ) 10, ) ) Defendants. OPINION In this case, Plaintiff Juli Wintjen is pursuing claims on behalf of herself and other current and former tipped employees of Defendant Denny’s, Inc. for unpaid wages under both the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (“PMWA”). After obtaining judgment in her favor on her individual FLSA claim, see ECF…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API