Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan Ass'n v. New Concept Realty & Development, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1984No. 15622Published

1Concurrence

BISTLINE, Justice,

specially concurring.

Key language in I.C. § 55-710 is that the certificate of acknowledgement must be substantially in the form there set out. While the form contains language which requires the oath of someone to prove that the person acknowledging is the person whose name is subscribed, the language of I.C. § 55-707 also speaks of an affirmation as well as an oath. Moreover, I.C. § 55-707 also requires that the swearing or affirming witness be proven by a credible person — no requirement of satisfactory evidence from a credible witness being incorporated into the § 55-710…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Little v. Bergdahl Oil Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Wilson v. Traer & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Harris v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API