Legal Opinion

Temple of 1001 Buddhas v. City of Fremont

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 4, 2022No. 3:21-cv-04661Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TEMPLE OF 1001 BUDDHAS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04661-CRB 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 10 v. DISMISS 11 CITY OF FREMONT, 12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff Miaolan Lee lives on property owned by the Temple of 1001 Buddhas in 14 Fremont, California. For the past eight years, City of Fremont employees have had 15 numerous interactions with Lee and the property, all pertaining to whether certain 16 structures on the property comply with various California laws and regulations and 17 municipal codes.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API