Legal Opinion
Nadeau v. Charter Township of Clinton
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 18, 1992No. Civ. 92CV75904DTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DeMASCIO, District Judge.
The plaintiffs filed this action for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the enforcement of Clinton Township Ordinance #291, an ordinance that prohibits public nudity, explicit sexual activity, and dancing with touching for compensation. The plaintiffs perform sexually oriented dances at “The IceHouse,” a bar owned by plaintiff Scott Nadeau. The other named plaintiffs perform in a “G-String” to cover the genital and anus area leaving exposed bare breasts and buttocks. The Clinton Township (Township) police arrested the plaintiffs on three different occasions for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Colonial First Properties, LLC v. Henrico County VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001