Legal Opinion
Russell v. Thielen
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 29, 1955PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
82 So.2d 143 (1955)
Carl E. RUSSELL and Bertha K. Russell, husband and wife, and Bruce Edward Kerney, Petitioners,
v.
Paul THIELEN, sometimes known as Paul Theilen, and Augustin Thierry, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
June 29, 1955.
Rehearing Denied September 12, 1955.
Shackleford, Farrior, Shannon & Stallings, R.W. Shackleford, J. Rex Farrior and Norman Stallings, Tampa, for petitioners.
Fowler, White, Gillen, Yancey & Humkey, Cody Fowler and Margaret Deaton, Tampa, for respondents.
2Per curiam
The subject matter of this litigation is "Whitfield Estates," a subdivision between Sarasota and…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Willis v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Proctor v. HearneSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Bryce Et Ux. v. BullSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Uhrig v. Redding, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
- Tidewater Construction Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- Futch v. HeadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Florida Tomato Packers v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Donna Lee H. Williams v. Michael BlutrichCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Hodges v. LoganSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Arango v. ReykaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.