Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 1992No. 90-AB-1269; CA A66564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Claimant, a teacher, seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denying her claim for unemployment compensation benefits for the 1988 summer school recess. In Mt. Hood Community College v. Employment Div., 101 Or App 314, 790 P2d 1164 (1990), we reviewed an earlier EAB decision that had found claimant eligible for those benefits. The facts relevant to this review are the same as before, except that, on remand, EAB reversed itself on a factual finding that was material to its decision.

Claimant was a tutor and part-time instructor at MHCC from 1978 through the winter term of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mt. Hood Community College v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Philomath Forest Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Washer v. Clatsop Care & Rehabilitation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. University of Alaska, FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. McSweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API