Legal Opinion

Barkman v. Quam

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1963No. 8085PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUTZ, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for change of venue on the ground of convenience of witnesses and on the further ground that such change would promote the ends of justice. The case involves an automobile accident which occurred on U. S. Highway No. 81, north of Grandin, in Traill County. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion of the defendant Bartholomay for such change of place of trial.

The plaintiff is a resident of Canada. In starting his suit against the defendants, all of whom are residents of North…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curren v. StoryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  2. McConnon & Co. v. SlettenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Ott v. KelleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Knoepfle v. SukoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Clark v. ClevelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Porth v. GlasoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bartholomay v. St. Thomas Lumber CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jamestown Plumbing & Heating Co. v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API