Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred Gene Bridges

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 24, 2003No. 01-30316PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge D.W. NELSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS.

OPINION

D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Alfred Bridges appeals his conviction following a jury trial for conspiracy to defraud the United States, making false claims to the United States, and mail fraud. Bridges contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that was seized by the Government with an invalid search warrant. Bridges also challenges the district court’s conviction and judgment because the Government allegedly violated his rights under *1013the Due Process clause…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. United States v. SDI Future Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. David E. MartinelliCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Hector Ruben Lopez, A/K/A Hector Ruben Pirate, Ruben Hector, Ruben "Pirate" Lopez-HectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Millender v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API