Legal Opinion

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Alcohol Fuel & Molasses Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered as upon a default resulting from an order striking out defendant’s answer because of its failure to obey a previous order of the court. This was a consequence of the following chain of circumstances: Upon oral stipulation between the attorneys, defendant by its president voluntarily appeared at the office of its attorney and submitted to an examination by plaintiff who, it was agreed, was to be furnished with a transcript by the defendant’s attorney. When the transcribed testimony was submitted to plaintiff’s attorney, a rather long statement made by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Levine v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Van Son v. HerbstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colonial Beacon Oil Co. v. B. Taranto, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API