Legal Opinion
St. Louis Insurance v. Glasgow
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided July 15, 1844PublishedCited by 7 opinions
APPEAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis,
1Opinion of the CourtNapton, J.
■This was an actioh of covenant on a policy of insurance; brought by Glasgow, Shaw & Larkin against the insurance company.
The policy was for $6,000 on one-fourth of the steamboat Pizarro, for one *714year, against the ordinary perils of “rivers, fires, enemies, Sen.,” and the assured agreed, “that the steamboat aforesaid should be competently provided with master, officers and crew.”
The declaration contains no averment of a compliance with the agreement, that the boat should be competently provided with “master, officers and crew,” but avers the loss to have happened within the year, and by fire,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Columbia Insurance Company of Alexandria, in Error v. Joseph W. Lawrence, Who Survived Thomas PoindexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Stetson v. Massachusetts Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Cleveland v. Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Karow v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Monsanto Chemical Co. v. American Bitumuls Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Holdom v. Ancient Order of United WorkmenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Angier v. Western Assurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.