Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1997No. 04-97-00108-CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Lloyd Howard Smith, was convicted by a jury and sentenced to twenty years confinement after pleading not guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child. Smith appeals his conviction. In three points of error, Smith claims that (1) the trial evidence was factually insufficient to support the jury verdict; (2) the failure of defense counsel at trial to request that the judge instruct the jury to disregard a witness’s speculative statement amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel; and (3) the trial attorney’s failure to object to the introduction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
  2. Chris Sanchez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
  3. Christie Osborne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Christie Osborne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. Clark, Jack Theotrice Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API