Legal Opinion
Winkels v. George A. Hormel & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1989No. 88-5197PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Peter T. Winkels appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Geo. Hormel & Company (Hormel), United Food & Commercial Workers International (UFCW), Local 9 of UFCW, and Joseph Hanson. We reverse. BACKGROUND
Winkels worked at Hormel’s Austin, Minnesota, plant and belonged to Local 9, formerly known as Local P-9, of the *568UFCW. In 1985, Winkels took a leave of absence from his job to serve as business agent for Local P-9, as allowed in Article 10.6 of the collective bargaining agreement in force at that time. Local P-9 decided to strike…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Herb v. PitcairnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Joseph P. Cange v. Stotler and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Griffen v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Prazak v. Local 1 International Union of Bricklayers & Allied CraftsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Frazier v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Med-Tec Iowa, Inc. v. Nomos Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- Weekley v. Guidant Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.