Legal Opinion
Griffen v. City of Oklahoma City
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1993No. 92-6335PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
The City of Oklahoma City (“the City”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for attorney fees, costs, and sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11, Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 12, § 2011 (West 1993), and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
In 1991, Plaintiffs, employees and former employees of the Oklahoma City Jail, filed suit against the City in state court alleging negligent infliction of emotional distress, violations of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, and violations of Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jose Romo v. Gulf Stream Coach, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Fox v. MauldingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Worldwide Primates, Inc., Paul H. Bass v. Shirley McGrealCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- World Outreach Conference Center v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Fox v. MauldingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.