Legal Opinion

Montz v. Montz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1941No. 17303PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit for partition. The question presented is one of law.

Where two or more heirs have inherited in indivision two or more pieces of real estate and, though they have never been sent into possession by a judgment of court, they have irrevocably and unequivocally indicated their intention to accept the succession and, for seventeen years, have actually used the property, do they continue to hold it as co-heirs so that no one of them may demand a partition of one of the pieces of real estate without requiring a partition of all of the succession property, or are they to be considered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Long v. ChailanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Mitcham v. MitchamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Bonvillain v. RichaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Prichard v. McCranieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Duffourc v. DuffourcSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Successions of ScardinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Fabacher v. FabacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Robinette v. MyersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Robin v. LobSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Crain v. CrainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API