Legal Opinion

Meilink v. Gianelli

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1929No. Docket No. 3803PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The facts stated herein are alleged in the complaint. The Joe Gianelli Company is a corporation with a capital stock of 1,000 shares. At all times since the organization defendants Joe Gianelli, Jr., has owned twenty-five shares, B. R. Gianelli twenty-five shares and Louiga Gianelli fifty shares, Guisseppe Gianelli, now deceased, owned 900 shares from the organization of the corporation to the time of his death. He left a last will by which he gave his wife Louisa Gianelli, one-half of his property and the other half to his children in equal shares. There is some uncertainty in the complaint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Western Pac. Ry. Co. v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Schade v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Theodore A. Kolb, Debtor. Robert M. Cassel, on Behalf of This Chapter 11 Estate v. Hilde Kolb, Trustee Jonathan Kolb Richard Kolb Douglas KolbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Howard v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Vance v. BizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Cassel v. KolbDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  5. Prudential Petroleum Co. v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API