Legal Opinion

Samuel G. Kooritzky v. Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 18, 1994No. 92-5277PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:

United States employers wishing to hire alien workers must navigate a maze of statutory provisions and regulations administered by the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Department of Labor. Samuel G. Kooritzky, an immigration lawyer and a prospective employer of an alien, filed an action to enjoin enforcement of one such regulation on the ground, among others, that the Department of Labor promulgated it without notice. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the government and Kooritzky…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Medellin v. BustosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  2. Checkosky v. SecCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  3. International Union, United Mine Workers v. Mine Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  4. Sprint Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Public Communications Council, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. O'Connell v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API